Long Waiting Times for Elective Hospital Care – Breaking the Vicious Circle by Abandoning Prioritisation

Authors

  • John-Helge Heimdal Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway | Clinic of Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit Sæther Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway | Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Torhild Heggestad Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Abstract:

Background Policies assigning low-priority patients treatment delays for care, in order to make room for patients of higher priority arriving later, are common in secondary healthcare services today. Alternatively, each new patient could be granted the first available appointment. We aimed to investigate whether prioritisation can be part of the reason why waiting times for care are often long, and to describe how departments can improve their waiting situation by changing away from prioritisation.   Methods We used patient flow data from 2015 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway. In Dynaplan Smia, Dynaplan AS, dynamic simulations were used to compare how waiting time, size and shape of the waiting list, and capacity utilisation developed with and without prioritisation. Simulations were started from the actual waiting list at the beginning of 2015, and from an empty waiting list (simulating a new department with no initial patient backlog).   Results From an empty waiting list and with capacity equal to demand, waiting times were built 7 times longer when prioritising than when not. Prioritisation also led to poor resource utilisation and short-lived effects of extra capacity. Departments where prioritisation is causing long waits can improve their situation by temporarily bringing capacity above demand and introducing “first come, first served” instead of prioritisation.   Conclusion A poor appointment allocation policy can build long waiting times, even when capacity is sufficient to meet demand. By bringing waiting times down and going away from prioritisation, the waiting list size and average waiting times at the studied department could be maintained almost 90% below the current level – without requiring permanent change in the capacity/demand ratio.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

A Mathematical Model for Scheduling Elective Surgeries for Minimizing the Waiting Times in Emergency Surgeries

The ever-increasing demands for surgeries and the limited resources force hospitals to have efficient management of resources, especially the expensive ones like operating rooms (ORs). Scheduling surgeries including sequencing them, assigning resources to them and determining their start times is a complicated task for hospital managers. Surgery referrals usually include elective surgeries that...

full text

Book Note Breaking the Vicious Circle: toward Effective Risk Regulation

Judging by the hostile reaction Stephen Breyer's book, Breaking the Vicious Circle, received at his Supreme Court nomination hearings last July, one might think Breyer had proposed the abolition of democracy itself. Calling Breyer "presumptuous and elitist," Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Joseph Biden told Breyer derisively that he was "delighted that as a judge you won't be able to take y...

full text

Factors influencing waiting times for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION Health Canada states that waiting list information and management systems in Canada are woefully inadequate, especially for elective surgical procedures. Understanding the reasons for waiting is paramount to achieving fairness and equity. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of demographic and clinical factors and surgeon volume on waiting times for laparoscopic ch...

full text

Measuring waiting times for elective surgery in public hospitals.

The article by Walters et al. raised some very important points related to the problem of long elective surgery waiting lists in Australian public hospitals, including those related to the reporting of waiting lists being a poor indicator of quality for a health service. The number of people on a waiting list does not actually give any indication as to whether patients are being seen within cli...

full text

Waiting times for hospital admissions: the impact of GP fundholding.

Waiting times for hospital care are a significant issue in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The reforms of the health service in 1990 gave a subset of family doctors (GP fundholders) both the ability to choose the hospital where their patients were treated and the means to pay for some services. One of the key factors influencing family doctors' choice of hospital was patient waiting time....

full text

Achieving 18-week waiting times in elective hand surgery

OBJECTIVE The Department of Health proposed an 18-week referral-to-treatment time (RTT) as a measure of high quality healthcare, to be achieved by December 2008. In 2007, referrals for elective hand surgery, to the Plastic Surgery Hand Service, were either direct or indirect. Direct referrals were from the general practitioner (GP). Indirect referrals were from other specialties, to which patie...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 9  issue 3

pages  96- 107

publication date 2020-03-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023